Current figure of economy pdf download

This book will give you a solid foundation to ace your exam with confidence. Yes, Most of the Competitive Exam aspirants recommend rs aggarwal reasoning book for competitive exams. There are lot of Books available from RS Aggarwal. The price of Rs Aggarwal Reasoning book is approx. We just provide the link already available on the internet and on google drive. If any way it violates the law or has any issues then kindly connect us on Facebook. Contact LAUS by e-mail or call Eastern Time , excluding federal holidays.

Written inquiries may be directed to: U. Unemployment Rate: 4. Change in Unemployment Level: , in Oct Civilian Labor Force Participation Rate: Employment-Population Ratio: Unemployment Rate: 8. Unemployment Level: 12,, for Menu Search button Search:.

For Your Information Where can I find the unemployment rate for previous years? Charts related to the Employment Situation news release. Download for free You need to log in to download this statistic Register for free Already a member? Log in. Show detailed source information? Register for free Already a member? More information. Supplementary notes. Other statistics on the topic. International Inflation rate in India International Unemployment rate in India Aaron O'Neill.

Research expert covering historical data. Profit from additional features with an Employee Account. Please create an employee account to be able to mark statistics as favorites. This diversity of legal forms and status has hampered the ability of some social economy organisations to access governmental support programmes. Policy makers are paying increasing attention to the social economy and how to support it, especially during the COVID crisis when its contribution has been essential.

Governments rapidly put in place measures for all economic players, including social economy organisations, to respond to the immediate economic impacts of the crisis. Many countries have addressed the ineligibility of social economy organisations to specific measures by enabling their access. Specific policy measures were needed to address the needs of social economy actors and support them in providing rapid and place-based solutions to overcome the crisis.

Table 1 provides a summary of the main measures applicable to social economy organisations since the COVID crisis began. The initial response in the first few weeks was focused on the survival and strengthening of such organisations.

More recently, measures have focussed on supporting further development of the social economy in its transforming role. Financial support to help social economy organisations cover their fixed costs via grants and accessible loans part of programmes to support firms in general or the social economy in particular. Continued easing of access to finance through credit guarantee schemes. Grants and loan access for social economy organisations with a focus on development of new business models, experimentation for social innovation and scaling.

Deferral of payments taxes, social security contributions, etc. Public procurement to engage the social economy as a supplier under exceptional circumstances masks, caregiving, consulting. Public procurement schemes that integrate additional social and greening clauses.

Job retention and unemployment support schemes to allow social economy organisations to preserve workers during the crisis. Provision of information on the general business development support programmes available as well as guides on how to address COVID as employers. Support with the development of the necessary skills to adjust operations through online capacity building, for example for teleworking or adjusting production.

Development of tools to help social economy organisations evaluate their impact. Creation of collaboration tools with social economy organisations through online discussion to inspire actions. Better coordination between various government initiatives and development of new partnerships to explore novel solutions and social innovations. Involvement of the social economy in strategic discussions to transition to a more inclusive and sustainable local development model; development of a dedicated strategy and action plan.

Improved visibility of the social economy through promotion of the sector, campaigns to buy local and social , and better social impact measurement tools. Distribution of personal protective equipment for selected sectors to social economy actors. During the first few weeks of the crisis, government efforts focused on ensuring the survival of social economy organisations and developing new partnerships crucial for the delivery of basic services.

Most countries applied an approach involving one or more of the following elements:. Financial support to help with fixed costs via grants and easily accessible loans. Although many social economy actors benefited from general support measures provided to organisations, some governments implemented special access schemes to ensure that all types of social economy organisations could access support measures.

For example, in the Italian region of Basilicata, a fund with a cap of EUR per co-operative was created to support their capitalisation and maintain employment levels. In France, a number of funds were created at the subnational level to provide facilitated access to loans — in the region of New Aquitaine, Banque des Territoires and France Active created a EUR 2 million Solidarity and Proximity Fund for social and solidarity economy organisations to provide short and medium term loans with a deferred repayment mechanism.

There are also numerous examples at the national level, such as the Canada Emergency Business Account CEBA interest-free loan of up to CAD 40 for small businesses and not-for-profit organisations to help cover their operating costs while their income is temporarily reduced. Deferral schemes for taxes, social security contributions and rents for public space. Schemes which improve the cash flows of social economy organisations has been critical.

Governments have also provided flexibility in relation to deadlines for the submission of administrative documents and allowed deferral of tax declarations, for instance. Access to unemployment benefits and related income support schemes was also adjusted in most OECD countries to provide more financial support to those who lost their job because of the COVID consequences.

These support programmes are typically limited in time and last for a period up to one year. In France, a temporary layoff programme allows employers to register their staff for a COVID-related temporary unemployment indemnity programme. However, the variety of legal forms of the social economy has sometimes created a need for an urgent reaction.

Provision of information on support schemes. Governments have facilitated access to information, allowing them to better understand available support schemes and eligibility criteria. Korea has developed leaflets on health-related issues concerning COVID for workers in social enterprises as well as available economic support packages and programmes for enterprises including social enterprises to help cover expenses.

Tools for collaboration. Governments have supported the development of tools to promote collaboration between the social economy and other stakeholders such as the private sector and citizens. They have also helped with tools to link volunteers with social economy organisations. Governments in Spain, Germany, Belgium, France, Canada and Slovenia have supported the development of volunteering platforms, various hackathons as a way to solve challenges created by the COVID crisis, as well as support social economy actors in their digitalisation process.

Distribution of personal protective equipment such as hand sanitizers and face masks to social economy organisations, prioritising those working in the health and care sectors. In some countries, social economy organisations were excluded from receiving personal protective equipment as decision makers did not associate them initially as actors of the healthcare system.

Measures and instruments in the consolidation phase promote organisational changes and offer assistance to adjust operations to the new realties.

This is accompanied by the need for closer collaboration between different levels of government to ensure consistency and the need to develop partnerships with social economy organisations. In order to address these issues, governments are implementing the following initiatives to support social economy organisations:. Continue the process of easing access to finance for the social economy, by providing grants, loans and other financial services for the provision of funding to support social economy organisations to overcome the crisis and reshape their business models to prepare for the post-crisis environment.

For example, in May , the Bundestag in Germany approved a proposal to define social enterprises, develop a cross-departmental plan to promote social innovation and social enterprises, remove potential access barriers to funding opportunities, and establish a programme for research and development of social innovations.

Support with access to market. Given the difficulty to sell products or services, especially for some sectors of the social economy such as hospitality or consulting, public procurement is being used as a way to engage the social economy as a supplier under exceptional circumstances. For example, Montreal has launched a dedicated CAD one million fund to finance calls for proposals from social economy organisation providing support to small enterprises in the city struggling due to the COVID crisis.

Develop the necessary skills in social economy organisations. The COVID crisis calls for new skills that social economy actors need to operate given the new reality. This support covers a variety of areas, such as assisting organisations to better use teleworking, developing new business models, and ensuring that support and advice is available to social economy actors. All around France, France Active in partnership with its 40 local associations, and with support of the government, promotes the provision of loans and provides advice to social economy organisations to improve their financial management skills.

Better co-ordination between various governmental agencies to avoid duplication and improve the efficiency of initiatives, including those covering social economy organisations. Since many government agencies had to develop support programmes in a very short period of time, there has been duplication of efforts which creates confusion for applicants.

To address this issue, in Spain an inter-ministerial commission was set up to ensure co-ordination within the government, while an inter-territorial commission was established to support co-operation among different levels of government.

Improved visibility of the social economy. Governments have a role to play in educating consumers about supporting local firms and the solidarity economy. A number of governments, especially at subnational level, have developed initiatives to promote local consumption. Le Panier Bleu, an initiative of the Quebec government, provides online links to local producers, encouraging Quebec residents to buy local. In Korea, the government supported the online sales of products developed by social economy organisations and promoted their private consumption.

One of the assets of the social economy is its potential to bring systemic change. Social economy actors are close to grassroots communities and are among the first to spot changes in society, including behavioural changes. Social economy actors have proven their ability to spot early trends such as the demand for fair trade products as well as organic and green products or support for waste recycling.

They have worked to mainstream these concepts over time. The COVID crisis provides an opportunity to scale-up the social economy so it can play a greater role in transforming societies. There is also a high expectation by citizens that the recovery should be fairer and greener compared to the recovery following the Global Financial Crisis, but it would require better collaboration and changing priorities.

Social economy actors and policy makers will need to work together with other stakeholders including academia, citizen-based organisations and private sector organisations to bring about this transformation.

This is especially important for the development of a strong local network, where local companies and the social economy could work together by experimenting and implementing new responsible practices. To help the social economy play its transformational role, policy makers could consider the following policy options:. Policy makers should strive to create an environment that promotes social innovation and experimentation and help the most promising examples to scale up, including the internationalisation of relevant practices.

This requires not only the right policy framework, but also dedicated funds which could absorb the risk of experimentation and promote collaboration and development of prototypes. While there are many resources for technological innovation, those for social innovation also merit notable investment.

Increase public procurement schemes with a focus on sustainable and inclusive social procurement. Sustainable public procurement, as well as procurement with social impact, harnesses existing expenditure on public procurement and directs it towards green and inclusive growth and the attainment of sustainability objectives. Many governments have encouraged their administrations to use it as a tool to support social economy organisations.

Korea promotes its preferential procurement scheme with pre-purchase and direct contracts for relatively small amounts under around USD 40 with social economy organisations. Germany has released a two-year EUR billion coronavirus economic recovery programme which contains a number of measures to boost green or environmentally friendly development.

Develop a common vision and promote collaboration with the social economy. Representatives of social economy organisations could be an asset in the development of a number of policies if involved from an early stage. An agreed vision of their contribution and role in development at national and subnational levels could be beneficial. This role should not be decided in isolation and a dedicated task force or a collaborative space involving policy makers, the private sector, the social economy, civil society organisations and academia could discuss their new vision, and where social economy organisations might be of most value to support that systemic change.

Social economy organisations should be involved in strategic discussions to prepare for the period after the immediate sanitary crisis, such as representation at relevant meetings of the various ministries, subnational authorities or committees to see whether social economy actors could contribute to the various initiatives and bring their knowledge and experience. Such discussions are already taking place in several countries, for example the Resilience Management Group in Belgium composed of researchers and representatives of enterprises have developed an action plan Plan Sophia involving measures to help transition the country towards more sustainable and inclusive growth.

The plan was presented to the federal and subnational governments with a number of its actions adopted. Continue to increase the visibility of the social economy through development of tools to help organisations evaluate their impacts as well as share data and best practice.